The man of St Matthew

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW

THE HEALING OF A PARALYTIC: Mt 9,1-8

We begin by noting how Mark and Matthew have placed this healing in different places in their stories. See how in Mark, this healing of the paralytic, Mk 2,1-12, follows the healing of the leper at the end of chapter 1 which Matthew used as the first of his healings, 8,1-4.
In Mark, this healing begins a series of episodes. Consider their purpose, look at Mk 3,6.

Compare the introductions to this healing provided by the three evangelists, that is 9,1 with Mk 2,1 and Lk 5,17.
Then compare Matthew's story of the healing with Mark's version and note how Matthew has reduced Mark's twelve verses to eight. We will see the effect of this reduction as we read.

Verse 1 therefore sets the scene as we have just seen. For Jesus' home town, see 4,13.

What is a bit strange about Jesus' response in verse 2? Look at Mk2,4. Why might what he is offering the paralytic be unexpected? Who might be the agent of forgiveness?

What is wrong with Jesus' reaction to the paralytic that leads to the response in verse 3? Who make the comment? See Mk 2,6.

What is the key word in verse 4? See Mark 2,8.

What is the difference between the two healings needed in verse 5?

How does verse 6 reflect verse 2?

What is the effect of verses 5 and 6: just how is the paralytic healed?

Consider how there is in verses 5, 6 & 7 a hint of the resurrection (see NABRE).

How has Matthew in verse 8 altered Mk 2,12? How does this go beyond Jesus himself? See 16,19 and 18,18.

Look now at my response.

We can now continue with the second interlude and the call of Matthew, 9,9-17.